Search

Sponsors

Member Stuff
Powered by Squarespace
Archive
Reconmended Sites
Updates

 

Sponsors

Entries in Apple (25)

Tuesday
Jun082010

The Gulf between the Geek and the Users

@media 2006 - Geek tattoos

Image by Francis Storr via Flickr

Like many of you, I spend a portion of each day pouring over RSS feeds, blogs and pod casts to get my daily tech and news fix.  Tech is a passion for me, and there is always something new and interesting to read and learn.  And I guess it is always cool to be the only guy in the room that knows about the latest Apple product, or the sales figures on the popular Apps stores, right?

OK, yes it does sound a little pathetic if you put it that way, that is why most of us have blogs, twitter accounts, and other ways to express geeky ways without too much ridicule.  If only this stuff was more interesting to the general public.  The problem is that it is not.  Despite the end user being more technologically savvy, that has not translated into them being interested in the technology they use.  I guess the good thing is that those of us in the service industry will always have a place, but the issue here is that the users will now be the driving force behind the future of technology, and if we can't pack the user base out with the savvy geeks, then the future is going to be heading in the direction of Facebook, Apple and Nintendo.

Click to read more ...

Friday
May142010

Which came first, Apple or HTML5?

Image representing Steve Jobs as depicted in C...

Image via CrunchBase

I'm one of those people who like to sit back and look at interesting tech industry drama's from a distance, preferably from a comfy chair with a cold drink, and look at the bigger picture.  Normally due to the speed of the tech industry, I don't really get much of a chance, but over the last couple of months the rise of the Flash v HTML5 question has given me plenty of comfy chair time.

With a rare moment of scripted openness, Apple's Steve Jobs posts his "Thoughts on Flash" wherein he steps out the reasons for Apple's move away from the format.  Worth a read regardless of which side of the fence you're on.  I wonder if, when the decision not to support Flash was made, if Apple thought it would cause such a stir?  Well, to add to Adobe's woes, Microsoft have uncharacteristically drawn an early line in the sand announcing HTML5 as the future of the web and support for HTML5 video steaming in IE9.

I have already posted about my thoughts regarding the demise of Flash, but I would like to step back a bit to ask the questions - was Flash on its way out before Apple made its stand? Does Apple have the power to force these decisions upon the industry with just a couple of devices/services? Or was Apple just ballsy enough to say and do what the industry was thinking, but couldn't work up the courage to do?

Click to read more ...

Monday
Apr262010

What would Apple Do?

Jeff Jarvis, famous blogger of Buzzmachine

Image by Robert Scoble via Flickr

I’m working my way through Jeff Javis’s Audio-book “What would Google Do?” at the moment.  It is one of the best studies on Google and their current, and future influence on online and business worlds.  The book looks at the business models that Google champions and shows how they are destined to fit into our online and offline lives.

Jeff reasonably points out that Google’s example is the future of business on the Internet.  Googles' example of free products, services and exchange of ideas is successful for them, and is shaping the way modern businesses on and off the Internet are needing to work to be successful in the modern business landscape.

I like the information and there is a lot of really good ideas about how we need to really focus away from old business models and start to think about “What Would Google Do?”.  But I would really like Jeff to write the book “What would Apple Do?”.  

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Apr222010

iPhone getting Multi-tasking: Are you happy now?

Tantek Multitasking

Image by Thomas Hawk via Flickr

With the announcement of the coming OS 4.0 for the iPhone we seem to be finally getting Multi-tasking.  There was a collective sigh of relief from the geeks, and a hurried re-organising from the hater's who saw the lack of multi-tasking as the iPhone's great sin against tech-kind.  Now the only issue Apple has left is the Adobe question, and Mr Jobs is happy to give a "No" as the answer.  So at least the hater's have something to focus on.

As a long time Win-Mo/HTC user, I'm disappointed that Apple has caved in to the pressure, and are poised to drop one of the best features of the iPhone platform, the lack of Multi-tasking.  Stopping third party Apps from multi-tasking is one of the key features that has made iPhone the first stable smart-phone, and allowed the smart-phone to reach beyond business and into the consciousness of the mass user base.

Now, yes, the iPhone has always been able to multi-task, that is why you can listen to the iPod App while you Tweet, web surf, or check-in with Foursquare.  It has just been restricted to the core function Apps of the device.  What this gave us was something that other smart-phones dreamed about, or took lots of micro-memory management to achieve, a stable device that could make and receive phone calls and the odd email.  Not to mention lasting a days usage, and I could go on and on (and often do).

With all the things that the iPhone does right, I really believe that the "no multi-tasking" is the reason the whole platform is successful.  This is one of those cases where stability and function win out over features. I mean, regardless of the hype, the iPhone was successful without features like cut and paste, which was standard on smart-phones before the iPhone.  So the platforms success was more about the things it didn't do and how that impacted on the stability of the core functions, than how it pandered to the Geek few.  Really, that is what Android is for.

So where are we at now? Maybe Apple have worked out the great smart-phone problem, and we are about get our cake and be able to eat it at the same time.  Gizmodo.com.au has a great post "How Multi-tasking works in iPhone OS 4.0" which explains nicely how Apple looks like they're going to run multi-tasking on the iPhone.  I'm still worried that this could break the useability of the core functions of the phone, or that many Apps will need to be updated to work properly with multi-tasking, due the fact that they had never needed to worry about memory management before.

In the end I guess I shouldn't be too concerned, this is Apple after all.  We will all love the result, regardless of the outcome.  And really, what are the other choices?

Jason Remnant

...if it isn't Broken, listen to the Geeks, they know how to mess it up.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Wednesday
Feb032010

The Fall of Flash: Adobe Flash

Image representing Adobe Flash as depicted in ...

Image via CrunchBase

The modern story of the fall of a platform is being lived out by the once great Flash.  In a world where it was becoming the most important feature of the web, Adobe's Flash has somehow squandered it all and looks to be on the verge of being displaced by HTML5, which isn't really out of the gate yet.

The nail in the coffin seems to be the continued issues Adobe is having with Apple, and its mobile products.  Apple has made a concerted effort to avoid the technical issues which surround Flash.  And that is to avoid Flash all together.  Many complain about this stance, but if you look at what is happening in hardware and the web, Apple is really just getting ready for the future, a less buggy future.

Steve Jobs comment at a recent Apple Town Hall meeting summed up the point:

"Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it's because of Flash. No one will be using Flash. The world is moving to HTML5."

The main issue that Apple would have had is that Flash is heavy on systems with few resources to spare.  And with the push to Net-books and mobile devices, the future is not heading to more power as much as it is heading towards more portable power.  This sort of move just doesn't have a place for Flash, unless of course Adobe can come up with a better, leaner and faster version.

Click to read more ...