The iPhone is a Feature Phone
Tuesday, December 21, 2010 at 9:30AM
Image by Florin Hatmanu via Flickr
-
The iPhone is a Feature Phone
-
It is a closed hardware and software ecosystem
-
It is not a bad thing
Broken Points:
In a recent post I called the iPhone a Feature Phone, and alluded that it was really a good thing, and it meant that it didn’t need to continue the battle with Google and Microsoft and their Smartphones. This may be a funny thing to say, because many would argue that the iPhone is one of the most successful Smartphones to date, and in fact may have put the Smartphone on the map for many of the non-geek mobile phone users. I don’t doubt that, but if you look at the iPhone with the mold of the Feature Phone in mind, the whole Apple strategy make more sense.
What is a Feature Phone? When you think Feature Phone or Dumb phone, you think of a hardware driven device with sturdy but limited software. There maybe some expansion, but it is purely at the discretion of the manufacturer. It is locked down, and has its own ecosystem that is controlled by the manufacturer.
What is a Smartphone? The smartphone is supposed to be opposite of the above. Within reason there are some limits, but they don’t normally extend to the OS or the software you can run on them. There is a amount of freedom to experiment and modify, and the features of the device tend only to be the processing power, RAM, and radios. One of the big early features of the smartphone was Internet and e-mail, and the ability to edit a few documents. And let’s not forget the addition of the Touchscreen and Stylus.
These are of course broad definitions. Another way to think about it would be to say that mobile OS’s like Android, Windows Mobile 6, and Windows Phone 7 are smartphones, and Symbian and the like are Feature phones. Now that most phones can access e-mail and Internet, the difference comes back to the manufacturer and their philosophy.
Nokia, the largest mobile phone manufacturer, makes mainly Feature phones. Yes, some of these phone can surf the web and receive e-mail, but they are locked into the Nokia ecosystem, and thus don’t allow for the freedom needed for a true Smartphone.
Now look at the Android platform. Google has created the platform to transcend the hardware and work within the freedom of the OS. It is almost as if your Android phone is the Linux testing box, or your PC that is there to be tweaked and modded. Oh and yes, you can get a full web, and computing experience to the limit of your hardware.
Now look at the iPhone again. Apple controls both the hardware and software, like Nokia. Apple controls the ecosystem and the software, like Nokia. There is a set amount of features (albeit a lot of features) for each phone, which Apple controls. And even though the iPhone did add a number of new and important features to the Feature Phone set, in many ways it just made them usable.
What I’m trying to say is that we shouldn’t be jumping up and down over Apple’s closedness and dictator like actions over its own mobile products. There has never been any intention that the iPhone is supposed to be a open Smartphone; it was just supposed to redefine the mobile phone market. To which I would have to say it has succeeded.
Jason Remnant
…if the isn’t Broken, there aren’t enough features.









![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a26b64c6-569f-44d1-91e2-5a5e77cb0a51)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6f0f5f6e-560a-4b5c-aa13-8ad59492b0cd)
